This post is the answer to those who think Gujarat chief minister is communal. You must think again, if you have been looking at him as a Hindutva leader. I have so many points to make, because I think Modi is a hardcore secular. I know, my all efforts will turn out to be useless, owing to the way Congress party has been misleading the muslims. The fact is, I was in Gujarat when riots broke out. I know better than Karan Thapar, Tista Setalvad, Barkha Datt, Sagarika Ghose, Rajdeep Sardesai & many other, what happened in 2002. 2002 is also counted as a blot on Narendra Modi's career. But, I must tell you Narendra Modi was helpless, the way people were outrageous at that time! Be patient & read carefully what I have written below.
When people say Narendra Modi is communal, indirectly they say Gujaratis are communal. It's we who have been electing him as CM since 2001. It's we, who believe in development politics of Mr.Modi. He is not a hindutva leader. He is gujarat's leader. The people who do not accept him, they do not accept a leader, Who has been elected democratically. I look at this whole issue as a conspiracy to widen the rift between hindus & muslims. Congress has conspired 2002 issue to shape a vote bank. But I must tell you, eventually it will lead to division of India!
Arnab Goswami, whom I respect for his unbiased stand on political affairs, asked Narendra Modi," You aften talk about development politics, but development is undone without engagement of minorities." Narendra Modi answered," I am the only politician in this nation today, who addresses people as 'six crore' Gujaratis. It is a shame for us that our prime minister, himself addresses people as hindu, muslim, sikh, isai.... is it right? tell me. If I put any development scheme into action, will it only benefit hindus?" He also speaks '120 crore' Indians! Has he ever said 'hindus & muslims'?
Once I was participating in a debate, a person in opposition, was constantly describing Narendra Modi as communal. I asked him, only one question! Only one question & he couldn't answer. The question was-" If you give me a single solid evidence of Narendra Modi's involvement in 2002, I will start speaking against him. Do you know how many riots have occurred in India, under Congress regime? Then why only Narendra Modi?" He didn't have any proof. It's a bitter reality that 99% anti-modi people do not have any proof, they just do so, because Congress is misleading them. Another bitter truth is 50% pro-Modi people support him, because they think he was involved in killing of Muslims. Recently, some Gujarati muslims came out in support of Narendra Modi as Congress only uses them to gain votes.
Let's talk about his puppy remark! It was a general statement & Congress leaders asked him to apologize?! For what? He just made a general statement showing compassionate side of his personality. I still can't understand what was wrong in that statement? Now come to his 'Burkha of secularism' remark. He slammed Congress for its votebank politics. Congress acts as caretaker of muslims, but Muslim bhaio, you should take initiative & say we will only vote for those who talk about India, not about any religion. We need to change our mindset. Now a days, there is race to become an intellectual. Secularism means 'Nation first' as NaMo says. I thank media for helping congress bringing India 10 years back. If any reader still have any doubt about NaMo's secular credentials, he may discuss it with me in comment section. Truth to be spoken. No matter, if people tell you another pro-Modi person. Yes, Narendra Modi lies sometimes in public, but it has nothing to do with his secular credentials.
I do not want claps from Modi supporters. I just want to write truth & that's what I have written. Thank you.
0 comments: